Zero-valent iron (ZVI) is an accepted and widely used remedial amendment for in situ chemical reduction applications. But if you’ve never implemented a ZVI remedy, what do you need to know before using it as an alternative for your site? In this blog post, I will highlight a few key areas that need to be considered.
If you want to dive deeper into how ZVIs work, join me next week for my webinar, How Understanding a Site’s Conceptual Site Model Can Prolong the Life Expectancy of a ZVI PRB Remedy. I’ll walk you through a real-life project, and explain how we were able to overcome site challenges and ensure a long and effective lifespan for our ZVI PRB remedy.
Several types of ZVI exist. The most common ZVI form is cast iron from recycled engine blocks. Other forms include atomized, CO reduced, water atomized, centrifugal atomized, hydrogen reduced, and electrolytic. The differences between these types include purity, size and, of course, cost.
Size does matter when it comes to ZVI. Typical ZVI sizes are grouped as granular, powder, colloidal and nano. The larger particle sizes provide overall longevity, while nano ZVI is highly reactive and expended quickly. When choosing which size to use for your project, you’ll need to consider the ZVI surface area, geology, method of distribution, and remedy life expectancy. Range of particle size is also a large consideration based on site geology.
While ZVI is a robust technology, geochemical factors in groundwater can affect the reactivity and longevity. We call these parameters “passivators.” They include sulfate, nitrate, oxygen, carbonate, silica, phosphate, chromate, and microbial activity. Before designing your ZVI remedy, you must have a robust understanding of the existing passivators in the subsurface. This is key to the success of your project, as it helps determine if you need to pre-treat the groundwater to reduce passivators.
While ZVI has been predominantly used in permeable reactive barriers (PRBs) as far back as 1995 in Sunnyvale, CA, other ZVI methods of emplacement include injection, fracturing, trenched in, ZVI column installation, and shallow soil mixing using soil mixers or buckets and deep auger soil mixing. The trend for future usage reflects the wider range of acceptable methods to distribute ZVI.
ZVI has advanced in this century as a combined alternative with biosubstrates and/or bioaugmentation as a biotic/abiotic approach. Some sites’ source areas have been successfully treated with in situ chemical oxidation using permanganate upgradient from downgradient installed ZVI PRBs.
There’s a lot to know and consider before using ZVI remedies.
If you’d like to learn more, register for next week’s webinar, How Understanding a Site’s Conceptual Site Model Can Prolong the Life Expectancy of a ZVI PRB Remedy. If you have questions, you can submit them during registration for me to answer during a Q&A.
You can also download the latest research about ZVI’s prevalence, differences, usage and trends.